Navigating masculinity

Strategic disinvestment from masculinity linked to poor psychosocial outcomes

A study highlights that men distancing themselves from traditional masculinity experience increased distress and anger, revealing complex ties between identity and mental health.

Recent research sheds light on the concept of “strategic masculine disinvestment,” where men intentionally distance themselves from conventional masculine ideals. This change has been linked to higher levels of psychological distress and anger.

Conducted by Jessica Pfaffendorf and Terrence Hill, the study explores how evolving notions of masculinity correspond with broader societal shifts. In particular, it focuses on the declining support for traditional masculinity, characterized by attributes like stoicism and assertiveness. As societal structures that uphold traditional masculinity weaken, men increasingly pursue alternative identity strategies.

The researchers utilized data from the 2021 Crime, Health, and Politics Survey (CHAPS), which included responses from a nationally representative sample of 803 men in the United States, aged 18 to 91. To evaluate strategic masculine disinvestment, participants were asked if they sometimes acted “less manly” to gain advantages in various aspects of life.

To assess psychosocial functioning, the study used validated scales measuring key indicators such as mastery, anger, anxiety, depression, and general psychological distress. Mastery was determined by participants’ perceived sense of control over their lives, while psychological distress was measured using the K6 Psychological Distress Scale, which identifies symptoms of nervousness, hopelessness, and worthlessness.

Findings revealed that younger men and those with college education were more likely to report engaging in masculine disinvestment, particularly among those influenced by progressive views on gender and identity in educational contexts. Interestingly, men facing economic challenges such as difficulty meeting basic needs—like paying bills or accessing healthcare—were also more inclined to adopt these behaviors. This challenges previous beliefs that masculine distancing is a phenomenon exclusive to more privileged groups, highlighting the impactful role of economic stability on gendered behaviors.

Notably, the research established consistent correlations between strategic masculine disinvestment and poor mental health. Men who engaged in disinvestment reported diminished feelings of mastery, indicating a reduced sense of control over their circumstances. Additionally, these individuals exhibited increased levels of anger, anxiety, depression, and significant psychological distress.

Takeaways

These results point to a paradox where distancing from traditional masculinity, often perceived as an adaptive shift, introduces substantial emotional and psychological hurdles. The authors suggest these challenges may emerge from cognitive dissonance and identity conflicts as men reconcile evolving ideals of masculinity within the context of persistent societal expectations.

While the study offers valuable insights, it’s important to note that its reliance on a single-item measure for assessing strategic masculine disinvestment may limit the results’ reliability.

Acknowledging the complexities of masculinity in contemporary society is essential for understanding the emotional health of men. As discussions around gender continue to evolve, it is crucial to support men in navigating these changes without compromising their mental well-being.

Author
Nicolae Pop
Published
January 24, 2025